Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Anaemia and its association with month and blood phenotype in blood donors in Fako division, Cameroon

BMC HematologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:29

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12878-016-0070-8

Received: 29 October 2015

Accepted: 22 November 2016

Published: 28 November 2016

Abstract

Background

Anaemia is one of the main factors in the deferral (disqualification) of blood donors following haematological screening. There is paucity of data on the prevalence of anaemia in blood donors in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of anaemia and its association with month and blood phenotype in blood donors in Fako division of Cameroon.

Methods

Blood donors were recruited between the 1st of January and 31st of December 2014, and their haemoglobin concentration (Hb) was determined using a haemoglobinometer. Anaemia was considered as Hb < 12 g/dl for females and Hb < 13 g/dl for males. The ABO and Rhesus blood groups were determined using standard techniques with monoclonal antibodies and the Coombs’ test. The Pearson’s chi-square, Pearson’s correlation, student T test, ANOVA, univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusting for gender and age as categorical variable were all performed as part of the statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 1896 blood donors predominantly males (91.35%) took part in the study. The mean age of the donors was 32 ± 7.81 years. On average, donors had donated blood 5.07 ± 3.54 times in their lifetime. The prevalence of anaemia observed in this study was 31.44% (95% CI: 29.35–33.58). The prevalence of anaemia was higher in females (p ≤ 0.0001) and in participants of age 20 years and below (p = 0.001). A marginal association was observed between prevalence of anaemia and season (p = 0.051). Furthermore, a significant association was observed between prevalence of anaemia and the blood group AB (p = 0.001). The risk of developing anaemia was higher in females compared to males (OR = 2.7, p < 0.0001). The mean Hb observed in this study was 13.42 ± 1.65; the mean Hb was not observed to be associated with the month or season adjusting for age and gender.

Conclusion

This study revealed a high prevalence of anaemia which translates to a high rate of donor deferral as a result of anaemia in the study area. The prevalence of anaemia was observed to be associated with the blood phenotype and the month, but not the season (dry or rainy). Further studies will be needed to ascertain the aetiology and associated factors for anaemia in blood donors in the study area.

Keywords

Anaemia Blood donors Prevalence Association Blood phenotype Season Fako Division Cameroon

Background

Anaemia is a condition where there is a decrease in the amount of red blood cells or less than the normal quantity of haemoglobin in the blood. It is the most common disorder of the blood and it symbolizes both poor nutrition and poor health [1]. The causes of anaemia are multifactorial and may result from blood loss, decreased red blood cell production or increased red blood cell breakdown [2]. Anaemia is a global public health problem affecting nearly a quarter of the world’s population [3]. Although its effect is felt in both developing and developed countries, developing countries are the most affected [4]. The management of anaemia commonly involves the use of iron pills, intravenous iron, and erythropoiesis-stimulating medications or by blood transfusion on a case-by-case basis.

The impact of anaemia on maternal and child health is well recognised. Severe anaemia has been linked to increased risk of maternal and child mortality [1, 5, 6]. Anaemia has also been linked to impaired psychological and physical development, behaviour, and work performance of the population [7]. In Cameroon, like most countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, the prevalence of anaemia is very high. In 2011, the prevalence was estimated at 63.3% in children and 49.5% in pregnant women [8]. Malnutrition is one of the main culprit for anaemia in Africa [9]. In addition to malnutrition, there are also infectious causes of anaemia in Cameroon including malaria and intestinal parasitic infections [1012].

The impact of anaemia on a country’s blood banking services has received relatively little attention. Anaemia is one of the main reasons for deferral (disqualification) of potential blood donors [13]. In countries where the prevalence of anaemia is high, this will have a profound effect on the blood stock, eventually compromising the quality of health care. This is not very unusual in developing countries like Cameroon where shortages of blood and blood products are frequent due to the high demand driven by the high rate of anaemia.

The prevalence of anaemia doesn’t seem to be constant all year round. In one study, Bondevik et al. [14] had observed a clear seasonal variation of the risk of anaemia in pregnant Nepali women, associated with rainfall and temperature. An earlier study by Palva and Salokannel [15] had also reported a seasonal variation in megaloblastic anaemia. Studies on the seasonal variation of anaemia among blood donor are not readily available.

In Cameroon, data on the prevalence of anaemia among blood donors is lacking in the scientific literature. It was against this drawback that we conducted this study to determine the prevalence of anaemia among blood donors in the Fako Division of Cameroon. The association between anaemia and blood phenotype, and between anaemia and month were also determined. This will generate baseline data which hopefully will be useful in the planning and implementation of blood transfusion services in the country.

Methods

Study design and duration

This was a cross-sectional study which started on the 1st of January and concluded on the 31st of December 2014. The study participants were donors who came to donate blood in the Regional Hospital of Buea during the study period.

Study area

The study was performed in Fako Division (4°10'00''N, 9°10'00''E) of the South West Region of Cameroon. The department covers an area of 2093 km2 with an elevation of 2707 m above sea level. Fako Division has an estimated population of 534,854 [16]. The major towns in Fako Division include Buea, Idenau, Limbe (Divisional headquarter), Muyuka and Tiko. The climate of Fako division is generally hot and dry with the exception of Buea where the climate tends to be humid because of its location at the foot of Mount Cameroon. Fako division has two seasons, the rainy and the dry seasons. The rainy season is usually between April and September, and the dry season is between October and March.

Study population

Blood donors (males or females) in the Regional Hospital of Buea were approached to take part in the study. Participants were to be between the ages 17 and 52 years and of weight ≥ 50 kg. All participants were expected to provide a signed informed consent which was duly explained to them in English, French or the local broken English language. Excluded from the study were individuals who did not meet the criteria for blood donation (unfit) such as donors on any medication, women who were breastfeeding or those on menstruation, and donors who had donated blood within 3 months prior to the study.

Participants were consecutively recruited into the study as they came to donate. Participants were enrolled just once and a single blood sample was collected from the participants.

Measurement of blood haemoglobin concentration (Hb)

Participants’ Hb was measured using a haemoglobinometer (ACON Mission Plus Hb, ACON Laboratories, Inc., USA). Briefly, about 10 μl of capillary blood from a finger prick was placed on the sample pad on the test strip in the haemoglobinometer using a capillary tube and the haemoglobin concentration (Hb) was read within 20 s. The haemoglobinometer was recalibrated on a daily bases using the control strip supplied by the manufacturer. In this study, anaemia was defined according to the WHO definition of Hb level lower than 12.0 g/dl for females and 13.0 g/dl for males [4]. The severity of anaemia was classified based on the WHO scheme as mild (Hb ≥ 11 but less than normal), moderate (Hb between 8 and 10.9 g/dl) and severe (Hb < 8) [17].

Blood group determination

The ABO and Rhesus (D) blood groups were determined using a commercially available kit for blood grouping (HUMAN DIAGNOSTIC, Germany). In determining ABO and Rhesus blood group, 4 spots of 30 μl of washed red cells were placed on a clean plate and anti-A, anti-B, anti-AB and anti-D grouping sera were added, mixed and rocked for 2mins on a mixer. Positive results were shown by haemagglutination.

Reverse ABO blood grouping was performed to confirm the blood groups of the participants by determining the reaction of the participants’ serum to known ABO washed red cells.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Stata® version 12.1 (StataCorp LP) statistical package. Statistical tests performed included univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusting for gender and age as categorical variable and the Pearson’s chi-square for qualitative variables, the student T test, ANOVA, and Pearson’s correlation analysis for quantitative variables. All quantitative variables were normally distributed. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

By the end of the study, 1896 potential blood donors were enrolled. Among them were 1,732 (91.35%) males and 164 (8.65%) females. The participants were between 17 and 52 years of age (mean ± SD = 32 ± 7.81). The donors had donated blood on the average 5.07 ± 3.54 times (range: 1–19) in their lifetime.

Five hundred and ninety six (596) of the 1896 donors were anaemic giving a prevalence of 31.44% (95% CI: 29.35–33.58). The prevalence of anaemia was higher in females 87/164 (53.1%) compared to males 509/1732 (29.4%). A significant association was observed between anaemia and gender (χ2 = 38.91, p ≤ 0.0001). Overall, the prevalence of anaemia was highest in participants of age 20 years and below (62.5%), and lowest in participants between 30 and 39 years of age (28.6%) (See Table 1). A significant association was observed between prevalence of anaemia and age (χ2 = 17.32, p = 0.001) (See Table 1). The association between prevalence of anaemia and age was significant among males (χ2 = 15.369, p = 0.002) but not among females (χ2 = 2.788, 0.424) (See Table 1).
Table 1

Prevalence of anaemia stratified according to age

Age category

Males

Females

Total

N

Anaemic (%)

N

Anaemic (%)

N

Anaemic (%)

≤20

25

15 (60.0)

7

5 (71.4)

32

20 (62.5)

21–29

702

200 (28.5)

93

51 (54.8)

795

251 (31.6)

30–39

611

165 (27.0)

39

21 (53.9)

650

186 (28.6)

≥40

394

129 (32.7)

25

10 (40.0)

419

139 (33.2)

Total

1732

509 (29.4)

164

87 (53.1)

1896

596 (31.4)

Overall, the prevalence of anaemia was highest in the month of February (39.7%) and lowest in October (25.2%) (See Table 2). A marginal association was observed between the prevalence of anaemia and month (χ2 = 19.62, p = 0.051). Among females, the prevalence was highest in March (66.7%) and lowest in July (33.3%), while among males, the prevalence was highest in February (39.5%) and lowest in October (20%) (See Table 2).
Table 2

Prevalence of anaemia stratified according to month and gender in the study population

Month

Males

Females

Total

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

N

Anaemic (%)

N

Anaemic (%)

N

Anaemic (%)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

Jan

120

32(26.7)

8

3(37.5)

128

35(27.3)

1.00

0.91 (0.55–1.51), p = 0.716

Feb

124

49(39.5)

12

5(41.7)

136

54(39.7)

1.75 (1.04–2.94), p = 0.038

1.54 (0.96–2.47), p = 0.077

Mar

133

33(24.8)

6

4(66.7)

139

37(26.6)

0.96 (0.56–1.66), p = 0.894

0.90 (0.55–1.48), p = 0.677

Apr

172

46(26.7)

20

10(50.0)

192

56(29.2)

1.04 (0.67–1.8), p = 0.723

0.92 (0.59–1.45), p = 0.729

May

161

53(32.9)

12

3(25.0)

173

56(32.4)

1.16 (0.7–1.9), p = 0.548

1.13 (0.72–1.79), p = 0.591

Jun

113

36(31.9)

10

5(50.0)

123

41(33.3)

1.33 (0.77–2.28), p = 0.302

1.16 (0.71–1.91), p = 0.555

Jul

111

32(28.8)

6

2(33.3)

117

34(29.1)

1.09 (0.62–1.9), P = 0.765

1.01 (0.6–1.69). p = 0.973

Aug

119

31(26.1)

9

5(55.6)

128

36(28.1)

1.04 (0.6–1.8), p = 0.889

0.91 (0.55–1.50), p = 0.700

Sep

155

43(27.7)

22

12(54.6)

177

55(31.1)

1.2 (0.73–1.98), p = 0.48

1.00

Oct

160

32(20.0)

20

11(55.0)

180

43(25.2)

0.83 (0.5–1.4), p = 0.492

0.71 (0.44–1.14), p = 0.154

Nov

233

73(31.3)

28

20(71.4)

261

93(35.6)

1.47 (0.93–2.34), p = 0.102

1.29 (0.85–1.96), p = 0.226

Dec

131

49(37.4)

11

7(63.6)

142

56(39.4)

1.73 (1.04–2.89), p = 0.036

1.54 (0.96–2.47), p = 0.071

Total

1732

509(29.39)

164

87(53.05)

1896

596(31.44)

  

The prevalence of anaemia in the Rainy season was 32.3% (318/986) and in the Dry season, it was 30.6% (278/910). No significant association was observed in the prevalence of anaemia with season (χ2 = 0.64, p = 0.425).

The risk of becoming anaemic was higher in females compared to males [OR = 2.7 (95% CI: 1.96–3.75), p ≤ 0.0001]. Univariate analysis (with January as the reference month) revealed that the risk of becoming anaemic was higher in the month of February (OR = 1.75, p = 0.038) and December (OR = 1.73, p = 0.036) (see Table 2). Furthermore univariate analysis (with February as the reference month) revealed that the risk of becoming anaemic was lower in the months of January (OR = 0.57, p = 0.038), March (OR = 0.55, p = 0.029) and October (OR = 0.48, p = 0.003). However multivariate analysis adjusting for age and gender revealed that the risk of becoming anaemic was comparable across the different months of the year (see Table 2).

In all, 457 (76.7%) of the participants had mild anaemia, 129 (21.6%) had moderate anaemia and 10 (1.7%) had severe anaemia (see Table 3). No significant association was observed between the degree of anaemia and month (χ2 = 27.26 p = 0.202) or season (χ2 = 2.23 p = 0.328).
Table 3

Severity of anaemia with respect to month in the study population

Month

Degree of anaemia

Total

Mild (%)

Moderate (%)

Severe (%)

Jan

30(85.7)

5(14.3)

0(0)

35

Feb

45(83.3)

9(16.7)

0(0)

54

Mar

30(81.1)

6(16.2)

1(2.7)

37

Apr

44(78.6)

12(21.4)

0(0)

56

May

50(89.3)

6(10.7)

0(0)

56

Jun

31(75.6)

10(24.4)

0(0)

41

Jul

29(85.3)

5(14.7)

0(0)

34

Aug

23(63.9)

12(33.3)

1(2.8)

36

Sep

39(70.9)

15(27.3)

1(1.8)

55

Oct

34(79)

7(16.3)

2(4.7)

43

Nov

63(67.7)

27(29)

3(3.2)

93

Dec

39(69.6)

15(26.8)

2(3.6)

56

Total

457(76.7)

129(21.6)

10(1.7)

596

Overall, the mean Hb in the study population was 13.42 ± 1.65 (range: 6.9–18.9). The mean Hb in females was 11.78 g/dl ± 1.44 (range: 6.9–15), while it was 13.57 ± 1.59 (range: 7.2–18.9) in males. The mean Hb was highest in the month of October and lowest in December (see Fig. 1). In males the mean Hb was highest in October, meanwhile in females, it was highest in May. In males, the mean Hb was lowest in February while in females, it was lowest in December (see Fig. 1). Multivariate analysis adjusting for gender and age revealed no significant association between mean Hb and month (p = 0.079).
Fig. 1

Monthly distribution of Hb in the study population overall (left), and stratified according to gender (right). No significant association was observed between Hb and month adjusting for age and gender

In this study, no significant difference was observed in the mean Hb between the rainy and the dry season (p = 0.350) adjusting for age and gender (see Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Distribution of mean Hb according to season in the study population. The mean Hb was observed to be higher in the rainy season overall (left) and in both males and females (right). The difference in the mean Hb between the two seasons was not observed to be significant (p = 0.350) adjusting for age and gender

In the current study, no significant correlation was observed between Hb and age (r = 0.043, p = 0.062).

The prevalence of anaemia was highest in participants with blood group AB 16(64%) (see Table 4). A significant association was observed between anaemia and blood group (χ2 = 15.63, p = 0.001).
Table 4

The distribution of anaemia with respect to blood phenotype

Blood group

N

Anaemic (%)

χ2

P-value

A

231

73(31.6)

15.63

0.001

AB

25

16(64)

B

216

78(36.1)

O

1424

429(30.1)

Total

1896

596

  

In all, 1827 (96.4%) of the participants were Rhesus (D) positive while 69 (3.6%) were Rhesus (D) negative. The prevalence of anaemia was higher among participants that were Rhesus (D) positive 575 (31.5%) compared to those that were Rhesus (D) negative 21 (30.4%). However no significant difference was observed between prevalence of anaemia and the Rhesus (D) antigen (χ2 = 0.033, p = 0.855).

Discussion

Anaemia is one of the main factors of clinical deferral of blood donors in developing countries including Cameroon. In this study, we investigated the prevalence of anaemia and its association with blood phenotypes as well as month among blood donors in Fako division of Cameroon. A high prevalence of 31.44% was observed in this study. The prevalence was higher compared to the 16% reported in Nigeria [18], 4.2% in Brazil [13], and 1.8% in India [19]. The difference between the prevalence of anaemia in these studies compared to ours could be attributed to the differences in the nutritional habits of these populations. Malnutrition and infectious diseases (such as malaria, intestinal parasitic infections, HIV) are some of the main factors contributing to the high prevalence of anaemia especially in children in Cameroon [12]. The high prevalence of anaemia implies 31.44% of the donors were deferred as a result of the anaemia over the year thereby constituting a huge loss of blood stock. Low supply of blood in a country with a high prevalence of anaemia like Cameroon will compromise the blood supply and therefore have an adverse effect on the quality of health care. In this study, the prevalence of anaemia was significantly higher in females compared to males, which is in line with studies performed elsewhere [19, 20]. Females were also observed to be at increased risk of anaemia in comparison to their male counterparts (OR = 2.7, p ≤ 0.0001). This is not unusual owing to the fact that women often fail to compensate their menstruational blood loss. In this study, 8.65% of the donors were females. Pregnancy, lactation and menstruation are some of the causes preventing blood donation in females. This may have resulted in a selection bias against females consequently influencing the true representation of the prevalence of anaemia in this group. The finding of fewer female donors in this study corroborate with work done by Silva et al. [13]. In this study, the prevalence of anaemia was observed to be higher in participants of 20 years and below irrespective of gender. A significant association was observed between prevalence of anaemia and age (p = 0.001). The finding of higher prevalence of anaemia among younger donors could be attributed to the fact that many of them were students who undergo a lot of stress with their study and hardly feed well. The association between prevalence of anaemia and age was significant among males but not among females. This difference could be due to the observation that the prevalence of anaemia was generally high among females irrespective of the age.

In this study, it was observed that the donors had donated blood on the average of 5 times in their lifetime. Studies have shown that there is an increasing depletion of the iron stores with increasing number of blood donation [2123]. The high frequency of blood donation observed in this study could have also contributed to the high prevalence of anaemia observed in this study.

We also observed the prevalence of anaemia to be highest in February and lowest in October. In the study area, the dry season is usually between October and March meanwhile the rainy season is between April and September. February which has the highest rate of anaemia falls in the heart of the dry season during which there is scarcity of foodstuffs including vegetables, which are also very expensive where available. This negatively affects the feeding habit of the population of Fako hence the high rate of anaemia. October which has the lowest prevalence of anaemia falls in the transition between the dry and the rainy season. During this period there is abundance of foodstuffs especially vegetables, which are also cheaper. At this time of the year, vegetables constitute a large part of the diet hence the lower prevalence of anaemia. A marginal association was observed between prevalence of anaemia and months in this study. The prevalence of anaemia was higher in the dry season compared to the rainy season which is not unusual. However no significant association was observed between prevalence of anaemia and season. The risk of developing anaemia was also observed to be higher in February and December but multivariate analysis adjusting for age and gender revealed similar risk of anaemia across the different months of the year. Like the prevalence of anaemia, no significant association was observed between the degree of anaemia and month.

The mean Hb observed in this study was 13.42 g/dl and ranged between 6.9 and 18.9 g/dl. The mean Hb was lower in females (11.78 g/dl) compared to males (13.57 g/dl). This is not unusual owing to the fact that the Hb of females is generally always lower than the Hb in males for reasons highlighted above. The mean Hb was highest in October and lowest in December. In this study, no significant association was observed between Hb and month (p = 0.079) adjusting for age and gender. The variation in the mean Hb with month could be attributed to the same factors associated with the prevalence of anaemia highlighted above. In females, the mean Hb was highest in the month of May and lowest in December, which is contrary to males in which mean Hb was observed to be highest in October and lowest in February. Like with the prevalence of anaemia in this study, no significant association was observed between Hb and season (p = 0.350), neither was there any significant association between Hb and age (p = 0.062).

In this study, it was observed that anaemia was significantly associated with blood group AB (p = 0.001). Not many studies have associated a particular blood group with anaemia in the literature. A previous study in 1956 had linked pernicious anaemia to blood group A [24]. In this study we did not determine the aetiology of anaemia which prevented us from knowing the exact type of anaemia associated with blood group AB. The prevalence of anaemia was higher in donors who were Rhesus (D) positive (31.5%) compared to Rhesus (D) negative (30.4%) donors. However this difference was not observed to be significant (p = 0.855). This difference could be attributed to the fact that the majority of donors were Rhesus (D) positive (96.4%).

In the current study, we did not determine the aetiology and risk factors for anaemia in the study population and this constitutes a major limitation. Studies are therefore required to ascertain the aetiology of anaemia in the study population as well as make prepositions to reduce the high rate of anaemia in blood donors in the study area.

Conclusion

A high prevalence of anaemia (31.44%) was observed which translates to an equivalent number of blood donors deferred as a result of anaemia in the study timeframe. The prevalence of anaemia was significantly higher in females compared to males and in participants of age 20 years and below. A marginal association was observed between the prevalence of anaemia and month but not with the season. The risk of developing anaemia was comparable across the different months of the year. Female blood donors and donors with the blood group AB were the most at-risk of developing anaemia compared to the others. In the current study, no association was observed between the mean Hb and month neither was there any association between mean Hb and season.

Further studies will therefore be required to ascertain the aetiology and risk factors for anaemia in the study population as well as make prepositions aimed at reversing the current high rate of anaemia in the study population.

Abbreviations

CI: 

Confidence interval

Hb: 

Haemoglobin concentration

OR: 

Odd ratio

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the director, doctors, nurses and laboratory staff of the Regional Hospital of Buea for allowing us to use their donors and for their help in the data collection. Our sincere gratitude also goes to the blood donors who took part in this study.

Funding

This study was funded by the authors.

Availability of data and materials

All the data supporting this findings have been presented in the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

TEK conceived and designed the study, participated in data collection, took part in the analysis and interpretation, conducted the literature search and review and critically revised the paper. TDBK participated in the statistical analysis, conducted the literature search and review and wrote the first draft of the paper. All authors read and approved the final paper.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Faculty of Health Sciences Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Buea, Cameroon. Administrative clearance was obtained from the Regional Delegation of Public Health of the South West Region of Cameroon and from the director of the Regional Hospital of Buea. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their inclusion.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Regional Hospital Buea
(2)
Department of Medical laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea
(3)
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Science, University of Buea

References

  1. WHO. Iron Deficiency Anemia: assessment, prevention and control. Geneva: WHO; 2001. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/66914/1/WHO_NHD_01.3.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 22 Oct 2015.Google Scholar
  2. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, Mitchell R. Robbin’s basic pathology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2007. ISBN 1-4160-2973-7.Google Scholar
  3. Janz TG, Johnson RL, Rubenstein SD. Anemia in the emergency department: evaluation and treatment. Emerg Med Pract. 2013;15 Suppl 11:1–15. quiz 15–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. WHO. Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993 – 2005: WHO global database on anaemia. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2008. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2008/9789241596657_eng.pdf. Accessed 22 Oct 2015.Google Scholar
  5. Anorlu RI, Odum CU, Essien EE. Asymptomatic malaria parasitaemia in pregnant women at booking in a primary health care facility in a periurban community in Lagos, Nigeria. Afr J Med Sci. 2001;30:39–41.Google Scholar
  6. Aimakhu CO, Olayemi O. Maternal haematocrit and pregnancy outcome in Nigerian women. West Afr J Med. 2003;22:18–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sandstead HH. Causes of iron and zinc deficiencies and their effects on brain. J Nutr. 2000;130:347S–9S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Stevens GA, Finucane MM, De-Regil LM, Paciorek CJ, Flaxman SR, Branca F, et al. Global, regional, and national trends in haemoglobin concentration and prevalence of total and severe anaemia in children and pregnant and non-pregnant women for 1995–2011: a systematic analysis of population-representative data. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1 Suppl 1:e16–25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Korenromp EL, Armstrong‐Schellenberg JR, Williams BG, Nahlen BL, Snow RW. Impact of malaria control on childhood anaemia in Africa – a quantitative review. Trop Med Int Health. 2004;9:1050–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Richardson DJ, Richardson KR, Richardson KE, Gross J, Tsekeng P, Dondji B, Foulefack S. Malaria, intestinal parasitic infection, anemia, and malnourishment in Rural Cameroonian Villages with an assessment of early interventions. J Ark Acad Sci. 2011;65:72–97.Google Scholar
  11. Zeukeng F, Tchinda VHM, Bigoga JD, Seumen CHT, Ndzi ES, Abonweh G, et al. Co-infections of malaria and geohelminthiasis in two Rural Communities of Nkassomo and Vian in the Mfou Health District, Cameroon. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8 Suppl 10:e3236.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Njunda AL, Fon SG, Assob JCN, Nsagha DS, Kwenti TZB, Kwenti ET. Coinfection with malaria and intestinal parasites, and its association with anaemia in children in Cameroon. Infect Dis Poverty. 2015;4:43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Silva MA, de Souza RA, Carlos AM, Soares S, Moraes-Souza H, Pereira GA. Etiology of anemia of blood donor candidates deferred by hematologic screening. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2012;34 Suppl 5:356–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Bondevik GT, Lie RT, Ulstein M, Kvale G. Seasonal variation in the risk of anaemia among pregnant Nepali women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;69(3):215–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Palva IP, Salokannel SJ. Seasonal variation in megaloblastic anaemia. Br J Nutr. 1972;27:593–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Statoids. Annuaire Statistique du Cameroun 2006. Obtained from Institut National de la Statistique du Cameroun. http://www.statoids.com/ycm.html. 2009. Accessed 25 Oct 2015.
  17. WHO. Haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity. Geneva: WHO; 2011. http://www.who.int/vmnis/indicators/haemoglobin.pdf. Accessed 22 Oct 2015.Google Scholar
  18. Erhabor O, Imrana S, Buhari H, Abubakar W, Abdulrahaman Y, Isaac IZ, et al. Prevalence of anaemia among Blood Donors in Sokoto, North Western, Nigeria. Int J Clin Med Res. 2014;1 Suppl 3:85–9.Google Scholar
  19. Bahadur S, Pujani M, Jain M. Donor deferral due to anemia: A tertiary care center-based study. Asian J Transfusion Sci. 2011;5:53–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Gupta AK, Agarwal SS, Kaushak R, Jain A, Gupta VK, Khare N. Prevalence of anemia among rural population living in and around of rural health and training center, Ratua village of Madhya Pradesh. Muller J med Sci Res. 2014;5:15–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Badar A, Ahmed A, Ayub M, Ansari AK. Effect of frequent blood donations on iron stores of non anaemic male blood donors. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2002;14 Suppl 2:24–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Cançado RD, Chiattone CS, Alonso FF, Langhi Júnior DM, Alves Rde C. Iron deficiency in blood donors. Sao Paulo Med J. 2011;119 Suppl 4:132–4.Google Scholar
  23. Addullah SM. The effect of repeated blood donations on the iron status of male Saudi blood donors. Blood Transf. 2011;9:167–71.Google Scholar
  24. Aird I, Bentall HH, Bingham J, Blackburn EK, Mackay MS, Swan HT et al. An association between blood group A and pernicious anaemia: a collective series from a number of centres. BMJ 1956;2:723–724.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016