Research article
Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Knowledge, attitude and practice towards blood donation and associated factors among adults in Debre Markos town, Northwest Ethiopia

  • Yenework Acham Jemberu1,
  • Ahmed Esmael†2 and
  • Kedir Y. Ahmed†3Email author
†Contributed equally
BMC HematologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:23

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12878-016-0062-8

©  The Author(s). 2016

Received: 14 September 2015

Accepted: 23 August 2016

Published: 5 September 2016

Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Although the demand for blood supply has progressively increased in developing countries, evidences indicate that there is a major shortage of blood and blood products in these countries, particularly in Ethiopia. Thus, identifying motivational factors affecting blood donation and recruitment of safe and low risk donors is necessary. For this reason, the study aimed at assessing knowledge, attitude, and practice towards blood donation and its associated factors.

Methods

A community based cross-sectional study was conducted in Debre Markos town from February to April, 2015. Multi-stage sampling technique was employed to recruit a total of 845 study participants. Interviewer administered questionnaire was employed as a data collection tool. Binary logistic regression was applied to assess the relationship between explanatory variables and outcome variables.

Results

In this study, 436 (56.5 %) and 403 (52.2 %) were found to be knowledgeable and having favorable attitude, respectively, while the other 124 (16.1 %) reported to have the practice of blood donation. Younger age group, male sex, those who attended formal education and radio listener were significantly associated with the knowledge of blood donation. Attending secondary and above education, having higher income, listening to radio broadcasts, and knowledge of blood donation were found to be the independent predictors of attitude. The practice of blood donation was higher among respondents who were older, attended certificate and above education, knowledgeable, and favorable attitude groups.

Conclusion

The prevalence of knowledge and practice of blood donation is found to be higher compared to similar study conducted in Mekelle, whereas the level of attitude is found to be lower. The finding of this study also justified any possible interventions on the independent predictors. There should be a regularly scheduled awareness creation and voluntary blood donation campaigns organized at the community level to utilize potential blood donors.

Keywords

Blood donation Knowledge Attitude Practice

Background

Blood transfusion is a fundamental and a requisite part of any nation’s health care delivery system for a lifesaving interventions. The need for blood and blood products is rising in all parts of the world [1, 2]. Evidence showed that about a quarter million maternal deaths globally and around 15 % of child mortality in Africa were attributed to obstetric bleeding and anemia, respectively [3]. Had there been adequate and safe blood transfusion service such a significant mortality would have been averted. Globally, around 92 million unit blood donations are collected annually from all types of blood donors. The lowest levels of availability are found in low and middle income countries, particularly in Africa [2]. Blood donation rates in Africa is estimated to be 5/1000 populations compared with developed countries which is 47/1000 population in USA [4].

Ethiopia is the second most populous nation in Africa, with an estimated population of 84 million [5]; a country with high MMR of 676/100,000 [6] and high motor vehicle accident (ranks 12th in the world) [7] and with a larger non-immune population for malaria. The Ethiopian Red Cross Society (ERCS) has been the pioneer organization in developing blood banking services in the country. According to ERCS, the country’s blood demand is estimated to be 80,000 to 120,000 units per year. However, only 24,000 units of blood were collected in 2004 (0.3 units/1000 people) and of these 17,000 units (71 % of the total) were collected from Addis Ababa. This figure indicates severe shortage of blood supply affecting the vast majority of the nation’s population (about 96 %) residing outside the capital city [8–10].

Therefore, improving the level of knowledge and hastening the development of positive attitude towards blood donation in the society should be the goal in designing an efficient strategy for sustaining a safe and adequate blood provision throughout the year. The first step to meet this goal should be performing an objective, thorough and comprehensive assessment of knowledge and attitude towards blood donation in the society. A study conducted in the city of Mekelle showed that half of the respondents have a low knowledge about blood donation. Only 10 % have highly supportive attitude and majority (88 %) did not have a history of blood donation [11]. This is lower than that of the study conducted among health science students in Addis Ababa. This study reported that the level of knowledge was 83 % while 68 % of students had favorable attitude, only 23.4 % of them reported history of blood donation [12]. Occupational status, educational level, sex [12, 13], peer pressure, encouraging media and religion [14] were commonly reported independent predictors of KAP of blood donation.

Considering the magnitude and the gravity of the problem, finding few research papers in the area although might sound a little surprising. This makes research in the area profoundly pragmatic. The result of this study will be used in launching an appropriate motivational campaign in the field as there is no community based study conducted in Ethiopia. The aim of this study was thus to assess knowledge, attitude, and practice towards blood donation and its associated factors.

Methods

Study design and study setting

Community based cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice towards blood donation and its associated factors among adults in Debre Markos town from February to April 2015.

Debre Markos town is the capital city of East Gojam Zone. It is located 300 Km from the capital of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa and 265 Km from the Amhara Region capital, Bahir Dar. Based on Ethiopian population and housing census 2007 estimation, the total population of the town was estimated to be 101,582, of which 52,827 of them were male [5].

Source and study population

All adults aged 18 to 65 years residing in Debre Markos town were the source population. Those adults who were selected by multi-stage sampling technique and lived in the study area for at least six months were included. Study participants who had serious illness during the data collection period and unable to hear were excluded from the study.

Sample size determination

The sample size was determined with a single population proportion formula by taking the prevalence rate of knowledge (49 %) from the Mekelle study [11], which gives the largest sample size. Using 95 % CI and 5 % margin of error, the sample size was found to be 845 after considering 10 % non-response rate and design effect of two.

Sampling techniques

Multi-stage sampling technique was used to recruit the study participants. At stage one, three Kebeles (the lowest administrative unit in Ethiopia) were selected from the total of seven Kebeles of the town by lottery method. At stage two, systematic random sampling technique was used to select households with proportional allocation to the size of the kebeles. Finally, lottery method was employed to select one study participant for households with more than one eligible individual (aged 18–65 years old).

Data collection

Data were collected by face-to-face interview by using a structured and pre-tested questionnaire. The questionnaire was first prepared in English and translated to Amharic, then translated back to English by another person to check for its consistency. The questionnaire had five sections comprising; socio-demographic factors (age, sex, marital status, religion, monthly income, educational status and occupation), behavioral factors, knowledge questions (31 questions), attitude questions (12 questions) and practice questions (four questions) of blood donation. Seven diploma nurses and two BSc nurses were recruited as data collectors and supervisors, respectively.

Data quality control

The quality of data was assured by proper designing of the questionnaire and pre-testing of the questionnaire in one of the Kebeles other than the selected Kebeles. Training was given for the data collectors as well as supervisors by the principal investigator for a day just before and a day after the pretest. During the entire data collection days, all completed questionnaires were reviewed and cross-checked for completeness by the supervisors and all the necessary feedback was given to the data collectors immediately.

Operational definitions

Based on the mean score, those who score mean and above for knowledge questions were categorized as ‘knowledgeable’, otherwise ‘not knowledgeable’. And those who score mean and above for attitude question were labeled as having ‘favorable attitude’, otherwise ‘unfavorable attitude’. Regarding practice, having at least one history of blood donation was used to label them as having practice.

Data processing and analysis

All the questionnaires were checked visually, coded, and entered into EPI info version 6.0, then transferred to SPSS version 16.0 for analysis. Frequencies, proportions, and measures of central tendency and variation were used for descriptive analysis. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to examine association between the explanatory variables and dependant variables. All variables with p value < 0.2 in bivariate analysis were entered in to the final multiple logistic regression model to identify variables independently associated with KAP towards blood donation. Backward stepwise likelihood ratio was used to select the final independent predictors. The significance of Odds Ratio (OR) was declared at p value < 0.05.

Ethical consideration

This Study was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Debre Markos University, College of Medicine and Health Science. Formal permission letter was also obtained from concerned bodies of Debre Markos town. All participants were adequately pre-informed with regard to the aim and the implication of the study and were clearly told as to their full right to refuse or withdraw their verbal consent to participate in the research. Confidentiality of information were kept including omitting personal identifiers such as the name of the respondents.

Result

Socio-demographic characteristic of respondents

A total of 845 participants were sampled and 772 (91.4 %) of them were interviewed which yield a non-response rate of 73 (8.6 %). Among respondents, 426 (55.2 %) and 670 (86.8 %) of them were females and had primary school and above educational level, respectively. About 686 (88.9 %) of participants were Orthodox in religion and 389 (50.4) of them were married in marital status. Two hundred fifty two (32.6 %) of them were private workers, while the other 179 (23.2) of them were government employers (Table 1).
Table 1

Socio demographic characteristics of respondents for the KAP of blood donation in Debre Markos town, Northwest Ethiopia, 2015 (n = 772)

Characteristics

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Age in years

 18–25

292

37.8

 26–35

235

30.4

 36–45

130

16.8

  > 45

115

14.9

Sex

 Male

346

44.8

 Female

426

55.2

Religion

 Orthodox

686

88.9

 Muslim

68

8.8

 Protestant/catholic

18

2.3

Marital status

 Married

389

50.4

 Single

335

43.4

 Widowed

32

4.1

 Divorced

16

2.1

Educational status

 No formal education

102

13.2

 Primary (1–8th)

66

8.5

 Secondary (9–12th)

237

30.7

 Certificate and above

367

47.5

Occupational status

 Private employer

252

32.6

 Government employer

179

23.2

 Student

167

21.6

 House wife

138

17.9

 Daily labor

20

2.6

 Other

16

2.1

Monthly Income in Eth. Birr

  < 500

91

11.8

 500–1000

165

21.4

 1001–1500

91

11.8

  > 1500

425

55.1

Knowledge about blood donation and its associated factors

All of the respondents were heard about blood donation at least once. The majority 601 (71.2 %) of which were heard from television followed by 92 (11.9 %), who were heard from radio. About 415 (53.8 %) and 480 (62.2 %) of them knew that people can donate once in three months, and blood donation can be started at 18 years of age, respectively. Six hundred nine (78.9 %) of respondents knew that blood donation is beneficial for the donor’s health. Majority, 746 (96.6 %) of respondents were reported that voluntary blood donation as the best source of blood supply and less than half (47 %) of them were aware of the risk of transmission of infection by blood transfusion. The risk of transmission of HIV, Hepatitis, Syphilis, and Malaria were mentioned by 46, 11.7, 12.2 and 6.1 % of the respondents, respectively (Table 2). Considering 31 knowledge questions, 436 (56.5 %) of them scored mean and above indicates knowledgeable about blood donation.
Table 2

Proportion of respondents who correctly answered knowledge questions among adults in Debre Markos town, Northwest Ethiopia, 2015 (n = 772)

Knowledge variables

Frequency

Percentage

Knew place of blood donation

685

88.7

Knew interval of blood donation

415

53.8

Age to start blood donation

480

62.2

Minimum criteria for blood donation

 Age 18–65 years

286

37.0

 weight above 45 kg

231

29.9

 Basic good health

540

69.9

Blood donation is useful for donors health

609

78.9

Importance of blood donation

 Free health checkup

107

13.9

 Healthy feeling

167

21.6

 Feeling of happiness

563

72.9

 Reduction of heart attack

55

7.1

 Burns calories and control body weight

34

4.4

 Lower risk of cancer

25

3.2

 Best source of blood donation

746

96.6

 There is such thing as artificial blood

521

67.5

Possible health risks of blood donation

 Anemia

251

32.5

 Cross infection

59

7.6

 Fainting

220

28.5

 Sudden death

32

4.1

HIV positive person can donate blood

666

86.3

Knew any infections transmitted by transfusion

363

47.0

Infection can transmit during blood transfusion

 HIV/AIDS

355

46.0

 Hepatitis

90

11.7

 Syphilis

94

12.2

 Malaria

47

6.1

Who are not eligible for blood donation

 Infectious disease patients

606

78.5

 Pregnant and lactating women

369

47.8

 History of major surgery in past year

190

24.6

 History of blood transfusion

119

15.4

 Intra venous drug users

53

6.9

The study showed that males (AOR = 1.89 95 % CI: 1.36, 2.61) were more knowledgeable than females. Those who were at the age range of 18–25 (AOR = 2.42 95 % CI: 1.33, 4.40) and 26–35 (AOR = 2.06 95 % CI: 1.13, 3.73) years were more knowledgeable compared to reference age groups of 45 years and above. Being at primary school level (AOR = 2.93 95 % CI: 1.39, 6.17), at secondary school level (AOR = 3.33 95 % CI: 1.68, 6.60) and Certificate and above educational level (AOR = 4.39 95 % CI: 2.29, 8.39) were significantly associated with knowledge of blood donation compared to those who have no formal education. The odds of being knowledgeable among radio broadcast listeners (AOR = 0.37 95 % CI = 0.19, 0.75) was significantly lower than internet and/or newspaper users (Table 3).
Table 3

Factors associated with knowledge towards blood donation among adults in Debre Markos Town, Northwest Ethiopia (n = 772)

Variables

Knowledgeable

COR 95 % CI

AOR 95 % CI

Yes

No

Sex

 Male

229

281

2.07 (1.55, 2.78)

1.89 (1.36, 2.61)**

 Female

207

367

1

1

Age (years)

 18–25

191

101

5.14 (3.18, 8.26)

2.42 (1.33, 4.40)*

 26–35

150

85

4.78 (2.92,7.80)

2.06 (1.13, 3.73)*

 36–45

64

66

2.63 (1.54, 4.49)

1.38 (0.75, 2.54)

  > 45

31

84

1

1

Educational status

 Non formal education

18

84

1

1

 Primary school (1–8th)

30

36

3.89 (1.93, 7.85)

2.93 (1.39, 6.17)*

 Secondary (9–12th)

147

90

7.62 (4.30, 13.5)

3.33 (1.68, 6.60)**

 Certificate & above

241

126

8.93 (5.14, 15.5)

4.39 (2.29, 8.39)**

Source of information

 Television

355

246

0.64 (0.38, 1.07)

1.03 (0.60, 1.76)

 Radio

29

67

0.19 (0.10, 0.37)

0.37 (0.19, 0.75)*

 Newspaper/Internet

52

23

1

1

COR, crude odds ratio, AOR adjusted odds ratio

**p-value < = 0.001, *p-value < 0.05

Bold data indicates significant association

Attitude of blood donation and its associated factors

Among respondents, 598 (77.5 %) of them showed willingness to donate blood in the future. Of these, 571 (95.4 %) of them wanted to donate blood as voluntary donor and, the rest 25 (4.3 %) and 2 (0.3 %) of them as replacement and paid donors, respectively (Table 5). Regarding the composite measure of attitude, about 403 (52.2 %) of the respondents had favorable attitude towards blood donation.

The likelihood of favorable attitude towards blood donation was higher among those who attended secondary school (AOR = 5.15 95 % CI: 2.81, 9.43) and certificate and above educational level (AOR = 4.85 95 % CI: 2.70, 8.72) compared to adults without formal education. The odds of favorable attitude was higher (AOR = 1.87 95 % CI: 1.13, 3.09) in 1500 Ethiopian Birr (ETB) and above monthly income groups. Radio listener had lower chance (AOR = 0.43 95 % CI: 0.21, 0.87) of having favorable attitude compared to newspaper and/or internet user. Being knowledgeable towards blood donation had increased (AOR = 1.40 95 % CI: 1.01, 1.94) odds of favorable attitude towards blood donation compared to its counterparts (Table 4).
Table 4

Factors associated with attitude towards blood donation among adults in Debre Markos Town, Northwest Ethiopia (n = 772)

Variables

Attitude

COR 95 % CI

AOR 95 % CI

Favorable

Unfavorable

Educational status

 Non formal education

18

84

1

1

 Primary school (1–8th)

20

46

2.03 (0.98, 4.22)

1.65 (0.77, 3.54)

 Secondary school (9–12th)

140

97

6.74 (3.81, 11.92)

5.15 (2.81, 9.43)**

 Certificate & above

225

142

7.39 (4.26, 12.83)

4.85 (2.70, 8.72)**

Average Monthly Income

  < 500 Birr

38

53

1

1

 500–1000 Birr

66

99

0.93 (0.55, 1.56)

0.87 (0.5, 1.53)

 1000–1500 Birr

28

63

0.62 (0.34, 1.14)

0.52 (0.27, 0.99)

  > 1500 Birr

271

154

2.45 (1.55, 3.89)

1.87 (1.13, 3.09)*

Use of media equipment

 Television

329

272

0.68 (0.41,1.12)

0.85 (0.51, 1.43)

 Radio

48

27

0.21 (0.11, 0.40

0.43 (0.21, 0.87)*

 Newspaper/internet

26

70

1

1

Knowledge

 Knowledgeable

171

265

2.23 (1.66, 2.97)

1.40 (1.01, 1.94)*

 Not knowledgeable

198

138

1

1

COR crude odds ratio, AOR adjusted odds ratio

**p-value < = 0.001, *p-value < 0.05

Bold data indicates significant association

Practice of blood donation and its associated factors

The practice of blood donation was found to be 124 (16.1 %) and of these, 79 (63.7 %) and 36 (29 %) of them were donated once, and twice, respectively. However, only 6 (4.8 %) of them were regular donors. Among those who ever donated blood, majority 79 (63.7 %) of them were voluntary donors and, the remaining 45 (36.3 %) were donated to a friend or relative in need of blood. The reasons for non-donation were inability to think of it 219 (33.8 %), lack of opportunity 212 (32.7 %), lack of time 72 (11.1 %), fear of pain 62 (9.6 %), fear of knowing their serostatus 9 (1.4 %) and non-remuneration 4 (0.6 %) (Table 5).
Table 5

The intention and practice of blood donation among adults in Debre Markos Town, Northwest Ethiopia, 2015 (n = 772)

Variable

Frequency

Percentage

History of blood donation

 Yes

124

16.1

 No

648

83.9

Frequency of donation

 Once

79

63.7

 Twice

36

29

 Three times

9

7.3

Type of blood donation

 Voluntary

79

63.7

 Friends/relative

45

36.3

Regular donors

 Yes

6

4.8

 No

118

95.2

Willingness in the future

 Ye

598

77.5

 No

174

22.5

Type of donation intended

 Voluntary

571

95.5

 Replacement

25

4.2

 Paid

2

0.3

Reasons of not blood donation

 Didn’t think of it

219

33.8

 Lack of opportunity

212

32.7

 Lack of time

72

11.1

 Fear of pain

62

9.6

 Fear knowing my status

9

1.4

 No remuneration

4

0.6

 Others

70

10.8

The likelihood of blood donation was higher among 18–25 years (AOR = 0.42 95 % CI: 0.19, 0.92) and 26–35 years (AOR = 0.26 95 % CI: 0.11, 0.63) of age groups compared to the reference group of 45 and above year olds. Participants whose level of education was certificate and above were more likely (AOR = 7.40 95 % CI: 3.04, 8.86) to donate blood compared to those who have no formal education. The odds of blood donation was found to be higher (AOR = 3.17 95 % CI: 1.90, 5.28) among knowledgeable respondents compared to their counterparts. The odds of blood donation was 5.19 times (95 % CI: 5.19 (3.04, 8.85)) higher among those with favorable attitude than unfavorable attitude (Table 6).
Table 6

Factors associated with practice towards blood donation among adults in Debre Markos Town, Northwest Ethiopia (n = 772)

Variables

Practice

COR with 95 % CI

AOR with 95 % CI

Yes

No

Age (years)

 18–25

39

253

1.11 (0.58, 2.14)

0.27 (0.11, 0.65)*

 26–35

39

196

1.44 (0.75, 2.77)

0.26 (0.11, 0.63)*

 36–45

32

98

2.36 (1.19, 4.68)

0.79 (0.33, 1.94)

  > 45

14

101

1

1

Educational status

 Non formal education

4

98

1

1

 Primary school

3

63

1.17 (0.25, 5.38)

1.01 (0.2, 5.09)

 Secondary school

21

216

2.38 (0.80, 7.12)

2.08 (0.58, 7.42)

 Certificate and above

96

271

8.68 (3.11, 24.23)

7.40 (3.04, 8.86)**

Knowledge

 Knowledgeable

100

336

3.87 (2.42, 6.20)

3.17 (1.90, 5.28)**

 Not knowledgeable

24

312

1

1

Attitude

 Favorable

104

299

6.07 (3.67, 10.04)

5.19 (3.04, 8.85)**

 Unfavorable

20

349

1

1

COR crude odds ratio, AOR adjusted odds ratio

**p-value < = 0.001, *p-value < 0.05

Bold data indicates significant association

Discussion

The overall level of knowledge towards blood donation was found to be 56.5 % which is higher than community based study conducted in the city of Mekelle (49 %) [11]. However, it is lower than another study conducted among health science students in Addis Ababa (83 %) [12]. The difference in socio-economic status with residents of Mekelle and in educational status with the health science students might explain the discrepancy with the above findings. About 53.8 % of participants knew that people can donate every 3 months, this is higher than other studies conducted in Benin, (21.5 %), Chennai (51.2 %) and Mekelle (43.6 %) [11, 15, 16]. The majority of them reported voluntary blood donation as the best source of blood donation. This is consistent with finding from Chennai [16], however it is higher than studies conducted among health workers (72.2 %), and physicians in Benin (80.7 %) [15–17]. Less than half (47 %) of adults knew the risk of transmission of disease through blood transfusion which is lower than that of the study conducted in Benin (95.7 %) [15] and, higher than that of the study conducted in India [18].

Age, sex, educational status and source of information were found to be independent predictors of knowledge of blood donation. Male study participants were more knowledgeable towards blood donation which is in line with findings from Karachi and North India [19, 20]. In Ethiopian context, males are more accessible to information and spent most of their time out of their home than females. Having at least primary education was significantly and positively associated with the knowledge of blood donation, which is supported by a study conducted in Sikim, India [13]. This could be because more educated people might be in a better position to access the media and availability of awareness creation at primary and secondary school and higher educational institutions. Participants who used radio as a source of information were less knowledgeable than those who used newspaper and/or internet. This might be partly explained by the limitations of radio programs on addressing the intended goals. On the other hand the low level of knowledge found in a radio listeners might be due to their limited access, techno illiteracy and their limited educational preparedness to understand, analyze and absorb the content of the message.

The composite measure of attitude based on mean score indicates that 52.2 % of the respondents had favorable attitudes towards blood donation. This is better than a study conducted in Karachi (42 %), however it is lower than similar studies conducted in India (87.3 %), Mekelle (61 %) and Addis Ababa (68 %) [11, 12, 19, 21]. More than three-fourth of respondents had intention to donate blood in the future which is lower than other studies conducted in India (90 %) and Addis Ababa (100 %) [12, 18]. Studies conducted in India and Addis Ababa carried out among health science students showed that knowledge of blood donation was higher as a result of their profession.

The present study found that educational status, average monthly income, source of information, and knowledge were significantly associated with favorable attitude towards blood donation. Participants who had higher monthly income were more likely to have favorable attitude than lower income groups. This might be because those who have higher income may access better information sources. Radio listener had lower chance of having favorable attitude compared to newspaper reader and internet users. This might be partly explained by the limitations of radio programs on addressing the intended goals. On the other hand, the low level of knowledge found in a radio listeners might explain the unfavorable attitude of them as knowledge is an independent predictor of attitude.

In addition, about 16.1 % of respondents reported at least one history of blood donation which is lower than similar studies conducted in Benin [15], Northern Nigeria [22], South India [21], and in Addis Ababa [12]. However, it is higher than other studies carried out in India (13.9 %) [18] and Mekelle (12 %) [11]. The difference in the practice of blood donation could be due to variation in the setup of study settings since some of the studies were conducted among health professionals and some others were at school level. Nearly two-third of blood donation were practiced as voluntary blood donation. This is supported by the study conducted in South India (64.1 %) [21]. About 4.8 % of blood donors were regular donors, which is very low compared to similar study conducted in Benin (13.9 %) and facility based study from Addis Ababa (42.2 %) [12, 15]. The major reasons reported from those who didn’t practice blood donation were inability to think of it (33.8 %), lack of opportunity to donate blood (32.7 %), and lack of time (11.1 %). Global researchers also concluded that people are not donating blood because nobody approached them for donation, lack of information, unfit to donate, a need to donate for a friend or relative in future, fear of needle and knowing their viral status, the donated blood may be sold, non-remuneration, ignorance and their religion [12, 15, 17, 18, 21, 23].

Age, educational status, knowledge and attitude were significantly associated with the practice of blood donation. Older age groups were positively associated with the practice of blood donation. This is similar with findings from Karachi and Iran [21, 24]. This might be attributed to increased personal experience from donating blood. Having certificate and above educational level was associated with increased practice of blood donation which is comparable with the study carried out in Addis Ababa [12]. This might support the fact that education can positively influence the knowledge and attitudes of blood donation. In addition, being knowledgeable and having favorable attitude were found to be independent predictors of blood donation. Knowledge of blood donation is a pre-requisite in obtaining access to and providing voluntary blood donation timely and effectively. It is also an important tool in avoiding fear and building positive attitude of blood donors. This is supported by a similar study conducted in Mekelle [11].

The fact that this study was conducted at the community level could be mentioned as the strength of the study. The nature of cross-sectional study which is not possible to establish cause-effect relationship between the explanatory variables and outcome variables, and the possibility of social desirability bias were among the limitations of this study.

Conclusion

The present study showed that the prevalence of knowledge and practice of blood donation is found to be higher compared to similar study conducted in Mekelle, whereas the level of attitude is found to be lower. Younger age group, male sex, who attended formal education and radio listener were significantly associated with knowledge of blood donation. Attending secondary and above education, having higher income, listening to radio broadcasts, and knowledge of blood donation were found to be the independent predictors of attitude. The practice of blood donation was higher among respondents who were older, attended certificate and above education, were knowledgeable, and had favorable attitude. The finding of this study also justified any possible interventions on the independent predictors. There should be a regularly scheduled awareness creation and voluntary blood donation campaigns organized at the community level to utilize potential donors who lack time and opportunity to donate blood.

Abbreviations

AOR: 

Adjusted odds ratio

COR: 

Crude odds ratio

ERCS: 

Ethiopian Red Cross Society

KAP: 

Knowledge attitude and practice

Declarations

Acknowledgement

We would like to express our heartfelt gratitude and sincere appreciations to all data Collectors and study participants in this study; without them this research wouldn’t have been possible. We would like to extend our sincere appreciation to the dedicated staffs working in Debre Markos branch of the Ethiopian Blood Bank service as they have provided us the relevant data and information related to our research work. We would like to express our deeper thanks to Debre Markos University, college of Medicine and Health Sciences and Gamby Medical Sciences College for facilitating the research work. Finally, our gratitude also goes to Dr. Mohammed Seid and Sualih Mussa for English language and grammar corrections.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset will not be shared in order to protect the participants’ identities.

Authors’ contributions

YAJ conceived and designed the study, performed analysis and interpretation of data and drafted the manuscript. AE and KYA supervised the design, conception, analysis, interpretation of data and made critical comments at each step of research. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Study was reviewed and approved by the Ethical review committee of Debre Markos University, College of Medicine and Health Science. All participants were pre-informed of the aim of the study and their full right to withdraw or refuse to participate before their verbal consent was obtained.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Community based newborn care officer
(2)
School of medicine, College of Medicine and health science, Debre Markos University
(3)
Department of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Debre Markos University

References

  1. World Health Organization. WHO Global Data Base on Blood Safety, Summary Report. Geneva; 2011.Google Scholar
  2. Blood safety and availability. [http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs279/en/]. Accessed Jun. 2014.
  3. WHO African Region. Regional training workshop on blood donor recruitment: pre- and -post donation counseling. Addis Ababa; 2006.Google Scholar
  4. World Health organization. Making Safe Blood Available in Africa, vol. Geneva: Statement by Coordinator; 2006.Google Scholar
  5. Central Statistical Agency (CSA). The 2007 Population and Housing Census of Ethiopia. Addis Ababa: Statistical Summary Report; 2008.Google Scholar
  6. Central Statistics Agency, ICF Macro Calverton. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey, vol. Addis Ababa: Final report; 2011.Google Scholar
  7. Ethiopia: Road Traffic Accidents. [http://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/ethiopia-road-traffic-accidents]. Accessed Dec 2014.
  8. Federal democratic republic of Ethiopia, Ministry of Health. National blood transfusion services strategy, vol. Strategy, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 2005.Google Scholar
  9. Blood safety. [http://www.afro.who.int/en/ethiopia/country-programmes/topics/4466-blood-safety.html]. Accessed Aug 2014.
  10. National Blood Bank Service in Ethiopia. [http://www.moh.gov.et/nbbso]. Accessed June 2014.
  11. Gebremeskel M, Girmatsion F, Lakew A, Zewda B, Mussie A. Intention to donate blood among the eligible population in Mekelle City, Northern Ethiopia: Using the theory of planned behavior. Am J Health Res. 2014;2(4):158–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Chalachew M, Meaza T, Andualem D, Megdelawit T, Tesfalem TT, Hawult T. The level and associated factors of knowledge, attitude and practice of blood donation among health science students of Addis Ababa University. Int J Med Health Sci Res. 2014;1(10):105–18.Google Scholar
  13. Shenga N, Thankappan K, Kartha C, Pal R. Analyzing socio demographic factors amongst blood donors. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010;3(1):21–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Balkees HA, Mohammad YNS. Investigating Knowledge and Attitudes of blood donors and barriers concerning blood donation in Jordan. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2014;116:2146–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Benedict N, Usimenahon A, Alexander IN. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Voluntary Blood Donation among Healthcare Workers at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria. J Blood Transfu. 2013;1–6.Google Scholar
  16. Uma S, Arun R, Arumugam P. The Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards Blood Donation among Voluntary Blood Donors in Chennai, India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(6):1043–6.Google Scholar
  17. Benedict N, Usimenahon A, Alexander NI, Isi A. Knowledge, attitude and practice of voluntary blood donation among physicians in a tertiary health facility of a developing country, Benin City, Nigeria. Int J Blood Transfus Immunohematol. 2012;2:4–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Sanayaima DH, Jalina L, Shantibala K, Vijaya EL. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) of Blood Safety and Donation. Ind Med Gaz. 2012;145(1):1–5.Google Scholar
  19. Ahmed Z, Zafar M, Khan AA, Anjum MU, Siddique MA. Knowledge, attitude and practices about blood donation among undergraduate medical students in Karachi. J Infect Dis Ther. 2014;2:134.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Anju D, Atul S, Rahul C, Rajendra C. Knowledge, attitude and beliefs of people in North India regarding blood donation, Lucknow, India. Simti servizi srl. 2014;12(1):21–7.Google Scholar
  21. Sabu KM, Remya A, Binu VS, Vivek R. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice on Blood Donation among Health Science Students in a University campus, South India. Online J Health Allied Scs. 2011;10(2):1–3.Google Scholar
  22. Salaudeen AG, Musa OI, Awoyemi AO, Bolarinwa AO, Adegboye AO, Samuel SO. Community survey on blood donation practices in a northern state of Nigeria. J Prev Med Hyg. 2011;52:21–5.Google Scholar
  23. Junu H. A research report on knowledge, attitude and practice on blood donation among 18–25 years bachelor level people. Masters thesis. HOPE International College, Department of Public Health; 2008.Google Scholar
  24. Mousavi F, Tavabi AA, Golestan B, Ammar-Saeedi E, Kashani H, Tabatabaei R, Iran-Pour E. Knowledge, attitude and practice towards blood donation in Iranian population. Transfus Med. 2011;21:308–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement