Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
2 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jill Waalen |
4 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carol Briggs |
15 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark de Souza |
20 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Susan Leitman |
16 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - John Starr |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
4 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark de Souza |
10 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jill Waalen |
23 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carol Briggs |
25 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - John Starr |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
25 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
8 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - John Starr |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
8 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
9 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - John Starr |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
9 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
11 Jun 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
11 Jun 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2326-10-4 |
You can find further information about peer review here.