Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The clinical presentation, utilization, and outcome of individuals with sickle cell anaemia presenting to urban emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Tanzania

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Jan 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karen Cordovil
12 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ahmet Emre Eskazan
16 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alauldeen Mudhafar Zubair
19 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Hendry Robert Sawe
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alauldeen Mudhafar Zubair
2 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karen Cordovil
12 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Hendry Robert Sawe
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Joseph Strouse
4 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - Hendry Robert Sawe
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Joseph Strouse
4 Sep 2018 Author responded Author comments - Hendry Robert Sawe
Resubmission - Version 5
4 Sep 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
10 Sep 2018 Editorially accepted
17 Sep 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12878-018-0122-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement