Factors associated with hospital readmission in sickle cell disease
© Loureiro et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 04 November 2008
Accepted: 27 February 2009
Published: 27 February 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|4 Nov 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Nov 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Monique Loureiro|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Nov 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Nov 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Josep Maria Borras|
|27 Nov 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robin Henderson|
|16 Dec 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shu-Kay Angus Ng|
|20 Jan 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Monique Loureiro|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Jan 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Feb 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shu-Kay Angus Ng|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|19 Feb 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Monique Loureiro|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|19 Feb 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|27 Feb 2009||Editorially accepted|
|27 Feb 2009||Article published||10.1186/1471-2326-9-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.